Thursday, January 10, 2008

Shhh! We have a winner (TheChronicleHerald.ca)

Shhh! We have a winner

Lotto Corp. didn't say pot went to retailer

By DAVID JACKSON Provincial Reporter

Thu. Jan 10 - 5:15 AM

 
 


From 2001 to 2006, retailers won Atlantic Lottery Corp. jackpots 19 times more often than statistically expected. (ERIC WYNNE / Staff)

 
 


Photo illustration by VINCE WALSH / Staff

 
 

The Atlantic Lottery Corp. hid the fact that one of its 2005 winners was a retailer because of concerns over news of retailer fraud in Ontario.

Documents obtained through a Freedom of Information request show that lottery corporation officials were jittery about releasing details of a Newfoundland and Labrador retailer's $25,000 Keno win because of a newspaper story about Ontario resident Bob Edmonds getting cheated out of a big win by a retailer.

"There wasn't a release issued to the media," reads a note attached to the Keno winner's file.

"(Blanked out) is a retailer and there was a story in the Globe and Mail on a retailer in Ontario that defrauded a player and claimed the winning lottery ticket as their own. The timing was not right to issue this release."

Besides the retailer's name, the date on a form the winner signed is also blanked out. The corporation cited privacy concerns.

Other media releases about winners at that time regularly said that retailers, if they were winners, had bought the tickets from their own stores.

The file indicates a short release about the win was posted on the Atlantic Lottery Corp. website, but there was no mention of the winner being a retailer.

That failure to disclose came more than a year before Mr. Edmonds's experience was the subject of a television documentary in October 2006. The story prompted intense scrutiny of retailer wins and lottery practices across the country.

In Atlantic Canada, a statistician found that Nova Scotia retailers won prizes of at least $25,000 at an almost impossibly high rate. From 2001 to 2006, they won 19 times more than statistically expected, and Jeffrey Rosenthal, a professor at the University of Toronto, calculated the chances of that happening by pure luck alone at less than one in two hundred million trillion.

In Atlantic Canada as a whole, another statistician found that retailers won 10 times more than the probabilities would suggest they should have.

Atlantic Lottery officials say they intend to do another statistical review of retailer wins. Liberal gaming critic Leo Glavine said the "selective disclosure" in 2005 was symptomatic of the problems at the lottery corporation. He said officials acknowledging the problem of the retailer fraud in Ontario should have examined retailer wins in Atlantic Canada right then.

He said the responsibility goes right to the top of the corporation, and that's why he has said CEO Michelle Carinci should be fired.

"We see now a history of very sloppy, incomplete and ineffective work from the administrative head of ALC," Mr. Glavine said.

New Democrat critic Howard Epstein said it was "nonsensical and offensive" to say the timing wasn't right to release information about the retailer.

"It's consistent, not just with being lackadaisical, but with shying away from being open with the public, and that's simply wrong," Mr. Epstein said.

He said it also shows again how Atlantic Lottery and the governments that own it were slow to react to potential problems with retailer wins.

Mike Randall, Atlantic Lottery's vice-president of social responsibility and communications, said the news release in question predates him. Staff who would have been responsible at the time have moved on to other jobs, he said.

Mr. Randall said he wouldn't have made the call to withhold information about a retailer winning.

"I think it's probably bad advice, or a bad decision that certainly wouldn't be made under my watch," he said Wednesday.

"I think that people were probably thinking of the retailer and not putting them through undue stress."

The file is one of dozens released under an information request for winners' files and news releases, as well as files of the corporation's investigations.

The lottery corporation released only the files for New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland and Labrador.

Police looked at the files related to retailer wins in those provinces and found nothing amiss in most of them. They were still reviewing four New Brunswick files when the corporation released the other documents.

RCMP in Nova Scotia are still looking at the files for this province, which include 56 customer complaints about retailer practices and 35 suspicious retailer wins. The lottery corporation has promised to release what information it can when the investigation is finished.

News reports in October 2006 about the number of retailer wins in Ontario led to an analysis in Atlantic Canada and to Atlantic Lottery hiring KPMG Forensic Inc. last year to review retailer wins.

KPMG criticized the lottery corporation's record-keeping and investigations. The files released under the freedom of information request have sections blacked out but seem to support that conclusion.

In one case, staff closed a file after several unsuccessful attempts to reach a retailer and a customer. In another file, a staff member referred to a complainant in an e-mail as a "loonie tune."

Many files dealt with complaints about a relatively small amount of money, such as $2 or $10. In 2003, a man who won $10 suspected he may actually have won $100,000. He was suspicious of how the clerk looked at him, the file said, plus he contacted a fortune teller who told him he'd won a large amount of money.

Atlantic Lottery has said it's following all the recommendations in the KPMG report to tighten up its controls. The steps it has taken include more thorough investigations, a more detailed winners' database and background checks for new retailers. It's also encouraging lotto players to sign their tickets.

The corporation blacked out names of winners in the news releases it sent in response to the freedom of information request. The corporation's policy is to publicize the names for up to a year, the longest term in the country, Mr. Randall said. Lottery officials are considering shortening that length of time, he said. He said they have to balance marketing efforts with a person's right to privacy, which can take a hit after a big lottery win.

Darce Fardy, president of the Right to Know Coalition of Nova Scotia, said he finds it strange that parts of news releases would be withheld, considering they were public in the past.

( djackson@herald.ca)

 
 

Inserted from <http://thechronicleherald.ca/Front/1010110.html>

NDP MLA slams government for secrecy (globeandmail.com)

NDP MLA slams government for secrecy

The Canadian Press

January 10, 2008

Victoria -- The NDP is accusing the provincial government of secrecy in the lingering court case stemming from the raid on the B.C. Legislature five years ago.

New Democratic MLA Leonard Krog says government lawyers are continuing to fight to prevent the release of documents to the defence in the corruption case involving two former government aides over the sale of B.C. Rail.

He says the public interest should trump the objections of the government's legal team.

 
 

 
 

Inserted from <http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20080110.BCBRIEFS10-2/TPStory/?query=secrecy>

Wednesday, January 09, 2008

Quote: "...in a garden of secrecy all that grows is suspicion."

"...in a garden of secrecy all that grows is suspicion."

-- Steve McSwain (senior vice president of Cargill Associates Inc)

 
 

 
 

 
 

Inserted from <http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/opinion/stories/2008/01/08/dollared_0109.html>

Tuesday, January 08, 2008

TI Malaysia welcomes new Government guidelines on Accountability

TI Malaysia welcomes new Government guidelines on Accountability

Kuala Lumpur, 02 January 2008

Transparency International Malaysia strongly supports the new guidelines introduced by the National Audit Department ("NAD") to ensure that government officials entrusted to make investments with public funds must follow new guidelines on accountability and also have the necessary credentials.

The new directive also requires that members of committees giving out government tenders should also be qualified and be present during all meetings to ensure procedures are followed before a final decision is made.

The introduction of an Accountability Index rating system which provides for four performance rankings ranging from "poor" for those scoring below 49% to a "four star excellent" rating for those scoring 90-100% for government ministries, government agencies and statutory bodies, local authorities etc is a step in the right direction. In this respect we suggest there should be a fifth rank for "bad performance" for those scoring below 30% as a reflection of the seriousness of this rating system.

The ratings should also be done annually for all agencies - as proposed for all ministries and state treasuries, and not just once in three years for the other agencies as a step for timely intervention to correct mismanagement.

We are also encouraged that the Auditor-General, Tan Sri Ambrin Buang and the NAD are pushing for suitably qualified and experienced employees are appointed to important positions and for proper succession plans to ensure no disruption in public services.

The proposal to correlate promotion of secretaries-general and department heads to their respective financial performance index will help ensure accountability in the stewardship of public funds and bring comfort to our tax payers.

Amongst others, the guidelines require that department heads make surprise checks to ensure proper management and utilisation of funds and timely and transparent quarterly reports by financial management committees and development committees. We propose that development committees should meet monthly and not quarterly to ensure effective monitoring of the implementation of projects.

We especially welcome the requirement that government assets should be kept and maintained on schedule and used strictly only for are official work is very timely.

The issuance of this new directive is a clear sign that the Auditor-General is serious about checking corruption and abuse of public funds and public assets and is in line with the Prime Minister and the Chief Secretary's publicly stated goal of improving the delivery system, under PEMUDAH .

TI-Malaysia also urges PEMUDAH to take heed of this latest directive and help monitor compliance with it amongst the departments and agencies concerned.

For info:

Tan Sri (Dr) Ramon V. Navaratnam (President) – 019 261 2288

Datuk Assoc. Prof Mohd Ali Hasan (Deputy President) – 019 389 7179

Richard Yeoh (Executive Director) – 012 302 8801

Media contact(s):

Tan Sri (Dr) Ramon V. Navaratnam (President)

019 261 2288

 
 

Inserted from <http://www.transparency.org/news_room/latest_news/press_releases_nc/2008/2008_01_02_malaysia_accountability>

Monday, January 07, 2008

Anti-corruption group seeks transparent resolution through independent review of Kenyan election results

Transparency International gravely concerned by allegations of election irregularities in Kenya

Anti-corruption group seeks transparent resolution through independent review of election results

Nairobi / Berlin, 07 January 2008

Transparency International Kenya and the global Transparency International (TI) movement are gravely concerned by serious allegations of election irregularities in recent Kenyan elections and the violent unrest they precipitated. The questions of transparency and integrity hanging over the presidential election in particular have the potential to fatally undermine governance and the fight against corruption in Kenya.

"TI calls for a transparent resolution to the current crisis, without delay, through an active process of mediation and an independent review of the campaign and election phases," said TI Chair, Huguette Labelle. "Any solution to this impasse must be based on international standards of transparency and election management."

The magnitude of the turmoil gripping Kenya today has deep roots. "The failure of critical institutions of governance, of parliamentary accountability, as well as flawed conduct and management of political parties, has bred this climate of political violence and uncertainty. Only through vigorous enforcement of accountability can good governance be restored," said the Chair of TI Kenya's Board of Directors, Dr Richard Leakey. "Independent mechanisms that hold all Kenyans to account are crucial to the legitimacy of any Kenyan government."

TI is alarmed at the plight of the victims, including refugees, of sectarian violence ignited by the elections and expresses its condolences to the hundreds of families who have lost loved ones, calling for the immediate restoration of peace. TI urges the leaders of Kenya, both in government and opposition, to exercise personal restraint and to demand the same of their supporters. The current violence has the potential to deepen poverty and foment an environment in which corruption thrives.

Africa has often resolved past crises peacefully through mediation and conciliation. Such a solution, pursued with the African Union and other impartial mediators, would provide a route out of the current quagmire, while an independent commission of enquiry would allow for a non-partisan, objective analysis of the electoral process and vote counting. For the sustained and peaceful development that all Kenyans deserve, governance institutions must be managed with unwavering accountability and the fight against corruption must be given top priority.

###

Transparency International is the civil society organisation leading the fight against corruption.

Media Contacts:

   

Nairobi:

Felgona Atieno

Press Officer, TI Kenya

Tel +254 721 917055

fatieno@tikenya.org

www.tikenya.org

Berlin:

Gypsy Guillén Kaiser

Press Officer, TI Secretariat

Tel +49 30 3438 20662

ggkaiser@transparency.org

www.transparency.org

 
 

Inserted from <http://www.transparency.org/news_room/latest_news/press_releases/2007/2007_01_07_kenya_elections>